<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1896: The Year We Did Linked Data Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/2009/12/1896-the-year-we-did-linked-data-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/2009/12/1896-the-year-we-did-linked-data-right/</link>
	<description>Philosophy. Logic. Semiotics. Singularity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 1896: The Year We Did Linked Data Right &#124; The Phaneron -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/2009/12/1896-the-year-we-did-linked-data-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 1896: The Year We Did Linked Data Right &#124; The Phaneron -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=39#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kingsley Uyi Idehen, rick murphy. rick murphy said: #iogdc #opengov 1896 The Year We Did Linked Data Right ! http://bit.ly/b6LfiS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kingsley Uyi Idehen, rick murphy. rick murphy said: #iogdc #opengov 1896 The Year We Did Linked Data Right ! <a href="http://bit.ly/b6LfiS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b6LfiS</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Awbrey</title>
		<link>http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/2009/12/1896-the-year-we-did-linked-data-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Awbrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=39#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>A few points of departure for Peirce&#039;s logical graphs can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://mywikibiz.com/Logical_graph&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few points of departure for Peirce&#39;s logical graphs can be found <a href="http://mywikibiz.com/Logical_graph" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Ravi Sharma</title>
		<link>http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/2009/12/1896-the-year-we-did-linked-data-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ravi Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=39#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>Rick&lt;br&gt;Great input and observations, I am of the opinion that the standards bodies have to give higher priority to the toplogy or ontology of their plethora of standards and take particular care in expressing how their meta-metamodels and other SDOs meta-metamodels interoperate, We can not live in silos and have to interoperate among SDOs and also we need to evaluate at what levels of models or standards does it make sense to interoperate?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks.&lt;br&gt;Ravi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick<br />Great input and observations, I am of the opinion that the standards bodies have to give higher priority to the toplogy or ontology of their plethora of standards and take particular care in expressing how their meta-metamodels and other SDOs meta-metamodels interoperate, We can not live in silos and have to interoperate among SDOs and also we need to evaluate at what levels of models or standards does it make sense to interoperate?</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />Ravi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for 1896: The Year We Did Linked Data Right &#124; The Phaneron [rickmurphy.org] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/2009/12/1896-the-year-we-did-linked-data-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for 1896: The Year We Did Linked Data Right &#124; The Phaneron [rickmurphy.org] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=39#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>[...] 1896: The Year We Did Linked Data Right &#124; The Phaneron  phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=39 &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  Describes the Pat Hayes BLOGIC keynote at ISWC 09. Describes lessons learned revealed in Pat&#039;s incidental comments. Recommends Pat&#039;s advice applies to OMG. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1896: The Year We Did Linked Data Right | The Phaneron  phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=39 &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  Describes the Pat Hayes BLOGIC keynote at ISWC 09. Describes lessons learned revealed in Pat&#8217;s incidental comments. Recommends Pat&#8217;s advice applies to OMG. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Ravi Sharma</title>
		<link>http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/2009/12/1896-the-year-we-did-linked-data-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ravi Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org/?p=39#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>Rick
Great input and observations, I am of the opinion that the standards bodies have to give higher priority to the toplogy or ontology of their plethora of standards and take particular care in expressing how their meta-metamodels and other SDOs meta-metamodels interoperate, We can not live in silos and have to interoperate among SDOs and also we need to evaluate at what levels of models or standards does it make sense to interoperate?

Thanks.
Ravi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick<br />
Great input and observations, I am of the opinion that the standards bodies have to give higher priority to the toplogy or ontology of their plethora of standards and take particular care in expressing how their meta-metamodels and other SDOs meta-metamodels interoperate, We can not live in silos and have to interoperate among SDOs and also we need to evaluate at what levels of models or standards does it make sense to interoperate?</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />
Ravi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

